Jeśli chcecie mnie wesprzeć to zapraszam do kupna mojego poradnika "Jakim jesteś Makiem?".

„Nielegalne, monopolistyczne działania” →

· Wojtek Pietrusiewicz · 0 comments

Philip Elmer-Dewitt na łamach Fortune:

It’s only in this, the final section of her opinion, that Judge Cote addresses the elephant in her courtroom: Amazon (AMZN), which before Apple arrived controlled 80% to 90% of the e-book market and was selling the most popular titles below cost.

„If Apple is suggesting that Amazon was engaging in illegal, monopolistic practices, and that Apple’s combination with the Publisher Defendants to deprive a monopolist of some of its market power is pro-competitive and healthy for our economy, it is wrong,” she writes. „Another company’s alleged violation of antitrust laws is not an excuse for engaging in your own violations of law.”

Perhaps. But it does raise a question that begs for an answer even more loudly now than before her verdict: Why the Justice Department chose to prosecute the new entrant in the e-book market, and not the monopolist.

Na koniec pada bardzo dobre pytanie.

Chcesz zwrócić mi na coś uwagę lub skomentować? Zapraszam na @morid1n lub na forum.